156 mining rights application denied


156 mining rights applications denied 
(The Freeman) Updated January 06, 2010 12:00 AM

CEBU, Philippines - The Mines and Geosciences Bureau-7 rejected a total of 156 mining rights applications last year as part of the bureau’s continuing cleansing efforts.

MGB-7 needs to reject non-performing or sluggish mining rights applications to leave only the potential ones that would contribute to the revitalization of the mining industry in Central Visayas.

Of the total 309 applications submitted to MGB last year, 63 were approved. Ninety applications are still pending and that 156 were rejected after careful considerations.

MGB-7 regional director Roger de Dios said that the rejection and cleansing efforts is a continuing activity of the bureau aiming to deter the increase of “mining speculators”, thereby promoting confidence to the real mining investors.

Mining rights applications include exploration permit, mineral production sharing agreement, andfinancial and/or technical assistance agreement.

“The order of rejection issued to 156 mining rights applications may be reversed based on the appreciation of the justifications or explanations as may be stipulated in the motion for reconsideration by the mining applicant themselves,” de Dios added.

MGB welcomes reapplication as long as applicant, even if previously rejected, can prove that they deserve approval provided all requirements are met.

One of the common reasons why a mining rights application is cancelled is the absence of a National Commission on the Indigenous Peoples Certification Precondition which is important in areas declared and occupied by indigenous peoples or communities.

Prior to the issuance of the said certification, applicants must secure a Free and Prior Informed Consent from the indigenous peoples concerned.

Other reasons for cancellation or rejection of mining rights applications include the absence of a Department of Environment and Natural Resources cearance, proof of consultation with local government units, proof of financial capability and proof of technical competence.

Some rejected applicants also failed to secure a certification of publication, posting and radioannouncement, area status and clearance by the one-stop-shop committee and other government agencies, and certification by the panel of arbitrators.

“Permit or clearance is also required from various DENR agencies particularly if exploration or mining activities will be conducted in protected, biodiversity and forestry project areas and a one-stop-shop committee is handling this,” de Dios added.

“Compliance with statutory requirements as a minimum shall always be considered fully before the mining rights applications shall have gained approval,” de Dios explained.

DENR has just shifted its policy in mining from “tolerance to promotion of mining”.

The new principle allows simplification of the processes involving acquisition of a mining permit including clearances and requirements from other government agencies.

De Dios said that MGB now, under the Minerals Action Plan policy reforms, seeks to create economic opportunities while pursuing a pro-environment and pro-community stance. – Jessica Ann R. Pareja/MEEV   (FREEMAN NEWS)

Source: http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=538497&publicationSubCategoryId=107 

 

Your rating: None
Tagged:

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

COMMENT RULES:

Hi everyone,

I'm the national coordinator of Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM), the owner of this site.

We will always respect views and opinions posted on this site, as much as we encourage open discussion and intelligent debate on the issue of mining. ATM has its stand on this issue very clearly, and we welcome the comments from those who do not agree with us.

However, we have observed that in the past few days, this forum has gone way beyond acceptable behavior of netiquette.

I will request and strongly encourage all posters to at least follow the following rules:

1. Be civil. Basic courtesy and privacy norms should be practised by posters in this forum. Make your mom at least proud by showing you still remember to be polite, even if you're not required to say "po" or "opo" in every post you make. We wouldn't mind that either, if you do so. Then again, I am assuming here that you're already an adult.

2. Personal attacks will not be tolerated. This also applies to flaming. Just in case you don't know what flaming is, its deliberately insulting or personally ranting against a poster (or a thread) simply because you are losing the arguments.

3. Avoid being anonymous. Since you have enough time to post long comments, you would at least have a few seconds to type even an alias. You also help people conclude that you are not a paid hack from a PR firm by Intex (or any other mining company)

4. Do not shout in the forums. Do not use ALL CAPS in your posts. A single exclamation point should also suffice.

We will observe the forum in the next few days. Should these rules be disregarded, we will transform this into a minimally-moderated forum. We hope we will avoid the situation that we will decide to make this a closely and strictly moderated forum. We value everyone's insights so much.

We'll check up again on this new rules after a short while. Of course, we expect the Intex ECC to be revoked in a few days. In this case, I suspect that the "excitement" in this thread would have died down.

Jaybee Garganera
National Coordinator
ATM
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.