ATM Statement on SC Ruling Against Local Ordinances Banning Mining

This Supreme Court decision has clear repercussions for existing local efforts to resist destructive and irresponsible mining. We take the SC ruling as a balanced interpretation of our laws on local autonomy and minerals management. In the real world where mining corporations and political dynasties rule economic decisions and management of our natural resources, this is not a just interpretation, from our simple view.

We’re partly disappointed as it seemingly reduces the police powers of LGUs, but we take note of the clear legal reasoning of Justice Leonen that LGUs must exercise all their powers and then decide to approve or disapprove SPECIFIC mining projects only, and that a blanket ordinance that prohibits ANY AND ALL mining projects in their locality is not justified.

We are asking the different legal groups and public interest law organizations to review and give a briefing to environmental and climate justice networks and affected communities as soon as possible, so we may be able to craft our local responses with concerned LGUs.

We will continue to support and give stronger and broader assistance to affected communities and local governments who refuse to allow the continued plunder of our natural resources while remaining blind to the multiple crises of climate, poverty, and hunger.

This SC decision only means we have to calibrate our approach and make interventions for biodiversity protection, climate resilience, and sustainable development while using all the available powers and platforms of local autonomy.

#AlyansaTigilMina #ATM